Dr. Leonard Morse, Plaintiff-Appellee v. John Fusto and Jose Castillo … – New York Law Journal (registration)
Dr. Leonard Morse, Plaintiff-Appellee v. John Fusto and Jose Castillo …New York Law Journal (registration)
The defendants, John Fusto, a former prosecutor with the New York State Attorney General’s Office Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, and Jose Castillo, a former audit-investigator with the Unit, appeal from the September 16, 2013, judgment of the United …
Police Brutality Cases Embraced By Personal Injury Attorneys Looking For Big … – International Business Times
International Business Times
Police Brutality Cases Embraced By Personal Injury Attorneys Looking For Big …International Business Times
Chris Fitzgerald, an attorney in New York City who focuses on civil rights and personal injury litigation, compared what phone cameras are doing for the justice system and civil rights now to what television did for civil rights in the 1960s, with the …
Cuomo aide left comatose from stray bullet victim of 2 warring gangs, sources say – New York Daily News
New York Daily News
Cuomo aide left comatose from stray bullet victim of 2 warring gangs, sources sayNew York Daily News
The governor’s aide left comatose by a stray bullet to the head was the victim of two warring gangs gunning for each other in a brutal Brooklyn turf war, sources said Tuesday. Carey Gabay, a 43-year-old Harvard-educated lawyer, was still fighting for …and more »
Lawyer Can’t Stop Practicing, Even After the Judges Tell Him to Stop
From: New York attorney Gary E. Rosenberg (personal injury and accident attorney and lawyer; serving Brooklyn Queens Bronx; Queens Injury Lawyer)
In Re: Bertram Brown
Please pay attention to this timeline:
December 15, 1954 – Bertram Brown is admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York.
On May 5, 2004 – a complaint was made by Lucia Santiago that Bertram Brown had represented the Santiago family in the sale of real property in Richmond Hill that netted proceeds of $61,498.35. Bertram Brown allegedly put the money into his personal bank account and spent some.
July 21, 2004 – a complaint was made that Bertram Brown took $74,000 of client funds, which he denies. A judge makes this complaint against him. Allegedly he sold a property for an estate (of a dead person) and kept the money from the sale, depositing it into his personal bank account, which money was supposed to go to the deceased’s heirs.
December 8, 2004 – a complaint was made by Janice Ryan who hired Bertram Brown to represent her in a foreclosure proceeding and to get her mortgage with Chase Manhattan Bank reinstated. The mortgage was $85,000 in arrears at that time. In order to facilitate the reinstatement, Ryan entrusted Bertram Brown with $73,069.00. After the bank rejected the application for reinstatement of the mortgage, Bertram Brown advised Ryan to file for chapter 13 bankruptcy protection. Bertram Brown also suggested he retain the money to hide it for the duration of the bankruptcy proceedings (which is bankruptcy fraud). Once Ryan demanded the return of the funds, however, Bertram Brown repaid only $7,500.00, and only after repeated demands. The checks totaling the $7,500.00 were drawn from Bertram Brown’s private account.
September 27, 2005 – Bertram Brown is immediately suspended from the practice of law, even before the charges against him are finally decided. This is to protect the public.
Further proceedings are held.
The Court notes:
“This Court’s order of suspension was entered on September 27, 2005, and was served via overnight mail on [Bertram Brown’s] then counsel in the afternoon of September 28th. On September 30th, [Bertram Brown] appeared before New York Civil Court Judge Jeffrey Oing, on behalf of his client Third Avenue Wireless, Inc. According to an affidavit from [Bertram Brown’s] adversary, [Bertram Brown] appeared that day and made an application for an adjournment so that he could prepare and submit opposition papers to a motion, and entered into a stipulation adjourning the motion for that purpose.
On October 3, 2005, the adversary telephoned [Bertram Brown] asking him if he was suspended. [Bertram Brown] initially did not admit to it, indicating that the Committee was only looking into allegations, but when pressed, finally admitted he was indeed suspended. On or about October 17, 2005, [Bertram Brown] served the Committee with his affidavit of compliance with the order of suspension as required by 22 NYCRR 603.14(a)(I), swearing therein that he had fully complied with the provisions of the suspension order and the rules.
Nevertheless, two days later, on October 19, 2005, [Bertram Brown] again appeared in court on behalf of a client, Virginia Khublall, this time before Queens Supreme Court Justice Allan B. Weiss. Prior to the call of the calender, [Bertram Brown] engaged in negotiations with his opponent. [Bertram Brown] then appeared on behalf of the plaintiff never alerting the court or his adversary to the fact that he was interimly suspended. While [Bertram Brown] eventually advised opposing counsel that he had to be substituted because of a disciplinary “problem”, he did not do so until Friday, October 21, during a settlement discussion. To date, [Bertram Brown] has never advised counsel that he has been suspended.”
October 25, 2005 – Bertram Brown is questioned under oath anjd denies that he practiced law
in the Khublall matter because he had informed his client that he had been suspended before the court appearance and only appeared in court to obtain an adjournment.
November 2, 2005 – a complaint was made by Andrea Conyers alleging that Bertram Brown, among other things, had been holding a real estate buyer’s down payment in the amount of $30,000 since November 2004. Bertram Brown claims the money is preserved intact and had been returned ott he buyer’s attorneys, but his bank records reflect that from October 14 through November 7, 2005 (after the effective date of his suspension), he made six withdrawals to himself totaling $24,000, causing the balance in his account to fall below the amount required to be maintained on behalf of that third-party buyer.
April 13, 2006 – Bertram Brown is disbarred (loses his law license) for good.
You would think this would be the end of this matter, but it’s not.
January 2007 – Bertram Brown is caught representing a client in The Bronx while using the name and credentials of a former associate, then again in Queens in September using the same alias. Both times, he is punished only with probation.
January 2009 – Bertram Brown, 81 years-old, surrenders to Brooklyn prosecutors for allegedly using a phony name to represent a client in a housing-court case. He was caught representing a Brooklyn landlord in a suit brought against him by a tenant. He faces mandatory jail time if he’s convicted of another felony.
Comment: Does anyone think to check if he’s mentally competent?
Do you know what live video surveillance by a defense investigator …
From: New York attorney Gary E. Rosenberg (personal injury and accident attorney and lawyer; serving Brooklyn Queens Bronx; Brooklyn Accident Lawyer)
If your accident case is big enough, and your claim of injury serious enough, usually there comes a time when the attorneys for the defense will hire a private investigator to have you watched, followed and videotaped.
This tends to happen towards the end of a lawsuit, after you, the hurt plaintiff, has testified at an oral deposition about how badly you’ve been injured and about all the things you can’t do and the activities in which you can no longer participate. Maybe you’re back at your job because it does not require much physical exertion, maybe you’re still out of work. Defense lawyers live to make “mountains out of molehills,” so they look for the
slightest indication that you’re not injured – even if you can do something a single time and not more than once. There is no way to show your pain the next day or that you need a heating pad and painkillers that evening from over exerting yourself.
The bad guys are trying to paint a picture of you for the jury; as someone who is not really hurt and, maybe, is a liar or just exaggerated about his or her injuries, so that you don’t deserve to be believed at trial.
An investigator can videotape you without getting out of their car. He or she tries to catch you running to cross the street or maybe running to catch a bus, or carrying bags of groceries. Maybe in a laundromat or going to the gym. The most dramatic surveillance videos that I have seen show injured accident victims engaged in sports. Playing football or tennis or even just bicycle riding.
I wish to make two points here, with a third point to follow.
First point, be truthful when testifying about your limitations. There are very few “can’ts” after an accident. Frequently, an injured person may still be able to engage in most of their pre-accident activities. But not as strong, or as long, or as vigorously. So if it’s truthful, say “Yes, I can do it. But not too much or too long or too often, and it hurts like heck afterwards.”
Second point. Accident victims: be aware if you go outside that you can be followed and be the subject of video surveillance. Video cameras are small and powerful and easy to conceal.
My third point follows and links back to the title of this blawg.
MySpace. FaceBook, etc. By now you’ve no doubt read about companies that check out
prospective employees’ social networking sites over the Internet. Is the job applicant shown in photos doing something incompatible with the company’s values? Is she using drugs? Or is he in a state of undress? Or making obscene gestures? Or showing a gang or prison affiliation? These occurrences are all too common these days.
Be especially careful if you’re an accident victim. Be wary about posting photographs to a
website that are inconsistent with your claims of physical limitation. And if you can’t engage in sports, don’t show your blue ribbon for winning a swim meet or a hockey trophy, and so forth.
The best policy if you’re claiming injury from an accident is to tell the truth. And be aware and on your guard in what you do.
Brooklyn Personal Injury Lawyer, Brooklyn Personal Injury Attorney, Personal Injury Lawyer Brooklyn Ny, Personal Injury Lawyer In Brooklyn, Personal Injury Lawyer In Brooklyn Ny, Personal Injury Lawyer Brooklyn Ny